• Get Review Board
  • What's New
  • Products
  • Review Board Code review, image review, and document review
  • Documentation
  • Release Notes
  • Power Pack Enterprise integrations, reports, and enhanced document review
  • Try for 60 Days
  • Purchase
  • RBCommons Review Board as a Service, hosted by us
  • Pricing
  • RBTools Command line tools and Python API for Review Board
  • Documentation
  • Release Notes
  • Review Bot Automated code review, connecting tools you already use
  • Documentation
  • Release Notes
  • RB Gateway Manage Git and Mercurial repositories in your network
  • Documentation
  • Release Notes
  • Learn and Explore
  • What is Code Review?
  • Documentation
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Support Options
  • Third-Party Integrations
  • Demo
  • What's New in Review Board

    Releases Security Updates Tips and Strategies — Subscribe Twitter Facebook
    Power Pack 3.0.2: Fixes for Team Foundation Server
    June 17, 2019

    Power Pack 3.0.2 improves integration with Microsoft's Team Foundation Server:

    • Copied files containing non-ASCII filenames can now be diffed
    • Compatibility between various versions of Review Board, Python, and Team Foundation Server has improved

    There's also several behind-the-scenes changes preparing Power Pack for new features we have in the works, and for the upcoming Review Board 4.0 release.

    Update Today

    Power Pack 3.0.2 is recommended for all Power Pack users reviewing code over Team Foundation Server.

    To upgrade, or to install for the first time, see the installation instructions.

    Review Board 3.0.15: Bitbucket Fixes and More
    June 11, 2019

    On June 11, 2019, Bitbucket removed an API that Review Board required in order to upload or view diffs. This caught us by surprise, and if you use Bitbucket, you may have had a rough day. Us too.

    We've worked around this in today's release, restoring full Bitbucket compatibility. We've also fixed some regressions introduced by changes to Bitbucket's webhook payloads (used to auto-close review requests).

    Going forward, Review Board 3.0.15 or higher is required to use Bitbucket.

    By the way, to keep track of important issues like this, follow us on Twitter.

    Along with the Bitbucket fixes, we've added some polish to other parts of the product:

    • Some sort of avatar will now always show up, no matter your configuration. If you've disabled all avatar services, we'll make sure the fallback avatar service is used.
    • Using emojis shortcodes? You've probably noticed they've been looking... a bit strange. A CDN changed on us, so we've updated to use the new one.
    • Very, very large images (high-DPI images, screenshots) shown in comments and other text fields would expand far outside their container, but no longer.
    • People sometimes like to paste URLs or other text in the Depends On field for review requests, which just sort of failed with an error. Now you'll see something more helpful.
    • If you've tried updating access lists for repositories lately, you may have noticed your changes weren't always saving. *ahem* We've taken care of that.
    • Writing custom extensions? Adding new review request actions? Callbacks registered with RB.ReviewRequestActionHook will now do what they're supposed to do, instead of crashing.

    See the release notes for everything in 3.0.15.

    Keep up with the latest Review Board releases, security updates, and helpful information.

    About
    News
    Demo
    RBCommons Hosting
    Integrations
    Happy Users
    Support Options
    Documentation
    FAQ
    User Manual
    RBTools
    Administration Guide
    Power Pack
    Release Notes
    Downloads
    Review Board
    RBTools
    Djblets
    Power Pack
    Package Store
    PGP Signatures
    Contributing
    Bug Tracker
    Submit Patches
    Development Setup
    Wiki
    Follow Us
    Mailing Lists
    Reddit
    Twitter
    Mastodon
    Facebook
    YouTube

    Copyright © 2006-2025 Beanbag, Inc. All rights reserved.

    Terms of Service — Privacy Policy — AI Ethics Policy — Branding