Your hardware designs deserve a better review process

Software teams have had good review tooling for twenty years. Hardware teams got a conference room, a projector, and someone taking notes. A board spin costs weeks and real money, so the review that catches a swapped pin is worth considerably more than the one that catches a typo.

We're building native review for EDA design files, so a board revision gets the same treatment as a code change: a real diff of what moved, layer by layer, with comments anchored to the components they're about.

It runs alongside the review you already do for RTL, firmware, and specs, on your own servers, with a permanent record of who signed off on what. We want to hear from the people doing this work about which formats and flows to support next.